Galym argues that in authoritarian countries, art is often subordinated to the state, losing its independence and primary role as a means of resistance and social consciousness. Instead of serving as a medium for free expression and critique, it becomes a tool for propaganda or is suppressed altogether. In capitalist systems, on the other hand, art is frequently commodified, reduced to mere products designed for mass consumption rather than meaningful cultural expression. This, according to Zhusipbek, undermines the true essence of art, which should be about creativity, community, and deeper societal impact rather than profit.